FLNT
Price
$2.05
Change
+$0.03 (+1.49%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
49.75M
XNET
Price
$7.70
Change
+$0.15 (+1.99%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
481.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLNT vs XNET

Header iconFLNT vs XNET Comparison
Open Charts FLNT vs XNETBanner chart's image
Fluent
Price$2.05
Change+$0.03 (+1.49%)
Volume$28.4K
Capitalization49.75M
Xunlei
Price$7.70
Change+$0.15 (+1.99%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization481.7M
FLNT vs XNET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XNET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLNT vs. XNET commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNT is a Hold and XNET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FLNT: $2.05 vs. XNET: $7.70)
Brand notoriety: FLNT and XNET are both not notable
FLNT represents the Advertising/Marketing Services, while XNET is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNT: 3% vs. XNET: 173%
Market capitalization -- FLNT: $49.75M vs. XNET: $481.7M
FLNT [@Advertising/Marketing Services] is valued at $49.75M. XNET’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $481.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $200.63B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.83T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXNET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XNET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XNET is a better buy in the long-term than FLNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XNET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XNET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XNET is a better buy in the short-term than FLNT.

Price Growth

FLNT (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while XNET (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was +14.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +40.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Advertising/Marketing Services (+14.12% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

@Computer Communications (+4.64% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XNET($482M) has a higher market cap than FLNT($49.8M). XNET has higher P/E ratio than FLNT: XNET (251.58) vs FLNT (0.53). XNET YTD gains are higher at: 286.935 vs. FLNT (-18.651). XNET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.75M vs. FLNT (-15.06M). XNET has more cash in the bank: 276M vs. FLNT (4.93M). FLNT has less debt than XNET: FLNT (26.6M) vs XNET (70.3M). XNET has higher revenues than FLNT: XNET (332M) vs FLNT (230M).
FLNTXNETFLNT / XNET
Capitalization49.8M482M10%
EBITDA-15.06M-6.75M223%
Gain YTD-18.651286.935-7%
P/E Ratio0.53251.580%
Revenue230M332M69%
Total Cash4.93M276M2%
Total Debt26.6M70.3M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLNT vs XNET: Fundamental Ratings
FLNT
XNET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9490
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
481
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLNT's Valuation (61) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as XNET (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FLNT’s stock grew similarly to XNET’s over the last 12 months.

XNET's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FLNT (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that XNET’s stock grew similarly to FLNT’s over the last 12 months.

XNET's SMR Rating (92) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FLNT (99) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that XNET’s stock grew similarly to FLNT’s over the last 12 months.

XNET's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FLNT (63) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that XNET’s stock grew similarly to FLNT’s over the last 12 months.

XNET's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNT (48) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that XNET’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLNTXNET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XNET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PKOH21.790.34
+1.59%
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp
NRT5.350.07
+1.33%
North European Oil Royalty Trust
CYD39.180.26
+0.67%
China Yuchai International Ltd
SVCBF13.36N/A
N/A
Svenska Cellulosa AB
WKRCF30.00N/A
N/A
Wacker Neuson SE

FLNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLNT and NCMI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLNT and NCMI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNT
1D Price
Change %
FLNT100%
+1.49%
NCMI - FLNT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
XNET - FLNT
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
ILLMF - FLNT
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
CNET - FLNT
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
HHS - FLNT
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
More