It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while HAIN (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -8.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
HAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
FLO | HAIN | FLO / HAIN | |
Capitalization | 5B | 706M | 708% |
EBITDA | 345M | -82.46M | -418% |
Gain YTD | -3.136 | -32.329 | 10% |
P/E Ratio | 40.74 | 28.57 | 143% |
Revenue | 5.09B | 1.78B | 286% |
Total Cash | 22.5M | 53.7M | 42% |
Total Debt | 1.35B | 895M | 151% |
FLO | HAIN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLO's Valuation (15) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAIN (86). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than HAIN’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAIN (100). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAIN’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's SMR Rating (51) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAIN (91). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAIN’s over the last 12 months.
HAIN's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (73). This means that HAIN’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
HAIN's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (94). This means that HAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.
FLO | HAIN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago49% | 24 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BEDZ | 34.15 | 0.14 | +0.42% |
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | |||
VNLA | 49.04 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF | |||
XRLV | 54.10 | N/A | N/A |
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF | |||
UCRD | 21.25 | N/A | N/A |
VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF | |||
CFO | 70.71 | -0.57 | -0.79% |
VictoryShares US 500 Enh Vol Wtd ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAIN has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAIN jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HAIN | 100% | -1.85% | ||
JBSS - HAIN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
THS - HAIN | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
FLO - HAIN | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
USNA - HAIN | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
LANC - HAIN | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More |