Advertisement
FLO vs SAPIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Buy and SAPIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAPIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.
| FLO | SAPIF | FLO / SAPIF | |
| Capitalization | 3.45B | 9.6B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 510M | 730M | 70% |
| Gain YTD | -18.631 | 34.044 | -55% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.14 | 42.57 | 36% |
| Revenue | 5.08B | 19.1B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 7.34M | 257M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 2.13B | 3.59B | 59% |
FLO | SAPIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLO's Valuation (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SAPIF (36) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SAPIF (100) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAPIF (92) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
SAPIF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SAPIF’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
SAPIF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SAPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.
| FLO | SAPIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 50% | 8 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
FLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
SAPIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAPIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAPIF | 100% | +9.30% | ||
| DAR - SAPIF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| FLO - SAPIF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| NOMD - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| CENTA - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| ASBFY - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||