FLO
Price
$14.81
Change
+$0.18 (+1.23%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
61 days until earnings call
SENEA
Price
$111.40
Change
-$1.04 (-0.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
764.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs SENEA

Header iconFLO vs SENEA Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs SENEABanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$14.81
Change+$0.18 (+1.23%)
Volume$4.52M
Capitalization3.13B
Seneca Foods
Price$111.40
Change-$1.04 (-0.92%)
Volume$53.61K
Capitalization764.71M
FLO vs SENEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. SENEA commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and SENEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $14.81 vs. SENEA: $111.40)
Brand notoriety: FLO and SENEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 159% vs. SENEA: 90%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $3.13B vs. SENEA: $764.71M
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.13B. SENEA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $764.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SENEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while SENEA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($3.13B) has a higher market cap than SENEA($765M). SENEA has higher P/E ratio than FLO: SENEA (17.85) vs FLO (14.24). SENEA YTD gains are higher at: 40.550 vs. FLO (-25.026). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 511M vs. SENEA (132M). SENEA has less debt than FLO: SENEA (298M) vs FLO (2.09B). FLO has higher revenues than SENEA: FLO (5.1B) vs SENEA (1.57B).
FLOSENEAFLO / SENEA
Capitalization3.13B765M409%
EBITDA511M132M387%
Gain YTD-25.02640.550-62%
P/E Ratio14.2417.8580%
Revenue5.1B1.57B324%
Total CashN/A12.1M-
Total Debt2.09B298M701%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs SENEA: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
SENEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
5378
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (4) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for SENEA (75). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (100). This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (78). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (85). This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (97). This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOSENEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGOSX72.34N/A
N/A
Hartford Growth Opportunities R4
BIGTX16.08N/A
N/A
The Texas I
GTSFX39.94N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
SCVFX30.79N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Value C
HSMFX12.93N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value F

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+2.97%
GIS - FLO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
CPB - FLO
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
CAG - FLO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
KHC - FLO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
MKC - FLO
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More

SENEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENEA has been loosely correlated with UTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENEA jumps, then UTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENEA
1D Price
Change %
SENEA100%
-0.92%
UTZ - SENEA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
FLO - SENEA
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
KHC - SENEA
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
CPB - SENEA
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.19%
TR - SENEA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More