Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWACX
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$43.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.15B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$34.97
Change+$0.17 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets718.01M
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWACX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Hold and HWACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWACX (718M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPSX (1.74) vs HWACX (0.34). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPSX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.57 vs. FLPSX (-9.42). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 67.26 vs. FLPSX (7.44).
| FLPSX | HWACX | FLPSX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.313 | 5.455 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 718M | 3,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 0.34 | 517% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.42 | -3.57 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.77 | 32.50 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.44 | 67.26 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.13 | 33.22 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement