Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWACX
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$42.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.48B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$34.36
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets705.78M
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWACX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. HWACX (706M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPSX (1.80) vs HWACX (0.35). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPSX (35 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPSX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. FLPSX (-9.71). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 56.52 vs. FLPSX (0.67).
| FLPSX | HWACX | FLPSX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.190 | 4.212 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5B | 706M | 3,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.35 | 522% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.71 | -0.30 | 3,262% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.11 | 13.14 | -115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.67 | 56.52 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.89 | 29.62 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement