Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$44.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$40.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.41M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Hold and HWAZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWAZX (722M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.73) vs HWAZX (1.17). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. FLPSX (-1.76). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 79.47 vs. FLPSX (3.80).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.828 | 7.464 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 722M | 3,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.17 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 8.20 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.07 | 27.81 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.80 | 79.47 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement