Ad is loading...
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.00
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.63B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$38.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.17M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. HWAZX (683M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.89) vs HWAZX (1.27). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (35 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.79 vs. FLPSX (-12.70). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 90.22 vs. FLPSX (9.02).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.294 | 1.792 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6B | 683M | 3,163% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.27 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.70 | -0.79 | 1,618% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.92 | 23.13 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.02 | 90.22 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers