Ad is loading...
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$38.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.29B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$36.05
Change+$0.21 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets640.4M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. HWAZX (640M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.87) vs HWAZX (1.23). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (35 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.33 vs. FLPSX (-16.28). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 87.41 vs. FLPSX (8.25).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.362 | -5.136 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 640M | 3,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.23 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.28 | -4.33 | 376% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.10 | 2.90 | -864% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.25 | 87.41 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers