Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.56
Change-$0.32 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$42.86
Change+$0.21 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets788.5M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. HWAZX (789M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.89) vs HWAZX (1.11). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. FLPSX (-3.36). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 82.58 vs. FLPSX (0.63).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.452 | 14.098 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 789M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.11 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.36 | 6.10 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.00 | 44.99 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.63 | 82.58 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers