Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$45.95
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$42.21
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.95M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a StrongBuy and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWAZX (754M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.66) vs HWAZX (1.12). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.49 vs. FLPSX (-4.50). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 82.53 vs. FLPSX (5.87).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.761 | 12.921 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 754M | 3,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.12 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.50 | 4.49 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.59 | 33.63 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.87 | 82.53 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement