Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.48B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$38.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.91M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. HWAZX (693M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.80) vs HWAZX (1.21). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (35 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.06 vs. FLPSX (-11.10). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 77.73 vs. FLPSX (2.95).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.626 | 3.826 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5B | 693M | 3,247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.21 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.10 | 0.06 | -17,872% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.10 | 18.01 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 77.73 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement