FLQL vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQL is a StrongBuy and LRCX is a Sell.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLQL | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GREUX | 13.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities R6 | |||
| RAFBX | 37.59 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| American Funds AMCAP R2 | |||
| MCTRX | 21.07 | -0.06 | -0.28% |
| NYLI Income Builder Class C | |||
| DFSPX | 13.13 | -0.08 | -0.61% |
| DFA Intl Sustainability Core 1 | |||
| STSRX | 15.74 | -0.10 | -0.63% |
| American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr R6 | |||
FLQL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQL | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| LRCX - FLQL | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CDNS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| AMAT - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 95% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 93% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
More | ||||