Ad is loading...
FLQS vs SCHA
FLQS vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts FLQS vs SCHA
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$36.33
Change-$1.49 (-3.94%)
Volume$217
Net Assets38.65M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$21.35
Change-$0.96 (-4.30%)
Volume$6.41K
Net Assets13.88B
FLQS vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQS vs. SCHA commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQS is a StrongBuy and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 13.9B vs. FLQS (38.6M). FLQS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHA: FLQS (-8.906) vs SCHA (-13.532). FLQS was incepted earlier than SCHA: FLQS (8 years) vs SCHA (15 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FLQS (0.35). FLQS has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| FLQS | SCHA | FLQS / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -8.906 | -13.532 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 38.6M | 13.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 23.57 | 11.00 | 214% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQS | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLQS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQS has been closely correlated with PATK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQS jumps, then PATK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQS | 100% | +7.82% | ||
| PATK - FLQS | 76% Closely correlated | +9.61% | ||
| JXN - FLQS | 75% Closely correlated | +9.95% | ||
| CVLG - FLQS | 72% Closely correlated | +9.90% | ||
| VCTR - FLQS | 68% Closely correlated | +12.90% | ||
| ACT - FLQS | 66% Closely correlated | +4.58% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +9.26% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.67% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +14.27% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +10.20% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +14.93% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +8.34% | ||
More | ||||