FLRAF
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
611.05M
FPLSF
Price
$7.04
Change
+$1.04 (+17.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
246.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLRAF vs FPLSF

Header iconFLRAF vs FPLSF Comparison
Open Charts FLRAF vs FPLSFBanner chart's image
Essentra
Price$1.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.73%)
Volume$500
Capitalization611.05M
5N Plus
Price$7.04
Change+$1.04 (+17.33%)
Volume$7.59K
Capitalization246.9M
FLRAF vs FPLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLRAF vs. FPLSF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRAF is a Hold and FPLSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FLRAF: $1.36 vs. FPLSF: $7.04)
Brand notoriety: FLRAF and FPLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLRAF: 207% vs. FPLSF: 42%
Market capitalization -- FLRAF: $611.05M vs. FPLSF: $246.9M
FLRAF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $611.05M. FPLSF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $246.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPLSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPLSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the long-term than FLRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLRAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPLSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLRAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FPLSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the short-term than FLRAF.

Price Growth

FLRAF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPLSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +11.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.99% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLRAF($611M) has a higher market cap than FPLSF($247M). FLRAF has higher P/E ratio than FPLSF: FLRAF (58.82) vs FPLSF (21.01). FPLSF YTD gains are higher at: 42.069 vs. FLRAF (-17.406). FLRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 121M vs. FPLSF (14.1M). FLRAF has more cash in the bank: 143M vs. FPLSF (41.4M). FPLSF has less debt than FLRAF: FPLSF (151M) vs FLRAF (454M). FLRAF has higher revenues than FPLSF: FLRAF (1.01B) vs FPLSF (255M).
FLRAFFPLSFFLRAF / FPLSF
Capitalization611M247M247%
EBITDA121M14.1M858%
Gain YTD-17.40642.069-41%
P/E Ratio58.8221.01280%
Revenue1.01B255M397%
Total Cash143M41.4M345%
Total Debt454M151M301%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLRAF vs FPLSF: Fundamental Ratings
FLRAF
FPLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9580
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
9054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLRAF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPLSF (91). This means that FLRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPLSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (90). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (79). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (98). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRAFFPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TESRX26.15N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares R
GCCSX32.88N/A
N/A
Gabelli Small Cap Growth C
PQIIX13.53N/A
N/A
PIMCO Dividend and Income Institutional
AFGZX31.47N/A
N/A
Alger Global Equity Z
VEUVX39.57N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic R6

FLRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLRAF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLRAF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLRAF
1D Price
Change %
FLRAF100%
N/A
EMNSF - FLRAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+12.57%
FPLSF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+17.33%
EVKIY - FLRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
More

FPLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLSF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLSF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPLSF
1D Price
Change %
FPLSF100%
+17.33%
EMNSF - FPLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUPPF - FPLSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FPLSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - FPLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
ELKEF - FPLSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More