FLRG vs SANM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRG is a Hold and SANM is a Hold.
SANM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLRG | SANM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 27 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBE | 47.26 | 0.80 | +1.72% |
| SPDR® S&P Bank ETF | |||
| FFA | 18.25 | 0.17 | +0.94% |
| First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund | |||
| MAXI | 21.18 | 0.18 | +0.86% |
| Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Inc ETF | |||
| GHYB | 43.44 | 0.26 | +0.60% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| EFU | 13.94 | -0.29 | -2.05% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | |||
FLRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLRG has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLRG jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLRG | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| QCOM - FLRG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| LRCX - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CDNS - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| EME - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| SNPS - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
SANM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SANM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANM | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| FLEX - SANM | 73% Closely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| CTS - SANM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BHE - SANM | 73% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| JBL - SANM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| LFUS - SANM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
More | ||||