Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and ITT Inc. (ITT) are key players in the industrials sector, specializing in engineered solutions for fluid management, pumps, and valves. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial metrics, and market dynamics, aiding investors focused on industrial manufacturing, energy transition, and infrastructure growth. Traders seeking relative performance insights or sector rotation opportunities will find value in understanding their contrasts in momentum, valuation, and growth drivers amid evolving economic conditions.
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) designs and manufactures engineered flow control systems, including pumps, valves, and seals, serving industries like oil and gas, chemicals, and power generation. In recent market activity, FLS shares declined sharply after its first-quarter 2026 earnings, reporting revenue of $1.07 billion, a 6.7% year-over-year drop that missed analyst estimates by 8.8%. Despite margin expansion to 15.1% adjusted operating margin, the company trimmed its full-year sales growth outlook to 3%-6% while maintaining adjusted EPS (earnings per share) guidance at $4.00-$4.20. Sentiment has softened due to weaker bookings and regional headwinds like the Middle East, though its forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 20.6 suggests relative value.
ITT Inc. (ITT) operates through three segments: Motion Technologies, Connect & Control Technologies, and Industrial Process, providing pumps, connectors, and motion systems for aerospace, automotive, and energy markets. Shares have maintained steady upward momentum in recent weeks, closing around $212 with year-to-date gains of 22.6% and one-year returns near 56%. The completion of its SPX FLOW acquisition bolsters the Industrial Process unit, enhancing market exposure. With first-quarter results due soon, positive analyst sentiment persists, supported by robust prior-quarter beats and a trailing P/E of 34.8, reflecting growth premiums amid strong liquidity and low debt levels.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, dynamically selected for suitability in current market conditions like volatility in industrials and tech sectors. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 23.9% to 163.7%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and diverse strategies across timeframes from 5-minute scalps to 50-day holds. They trade hundreds of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing AI/ML models with take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3%/2%). Whether short-term momentum or thematic plays in industrials, exploring these bots offers data-driven edges—visit Trending AI Robots to identify fits for your portfolio.
Business models differ in scope: FLS focuses narrowly on flow control solutions, while ITT offers diversified exposure across pumps, motion, and connectors, reducing single-market risks. Growth drivers favor ITT with recent 13.5% quarterly revenue growth and acquisition synergies versus FLS's moderated outlook. Recent momentum tilts to ITT's consistent gains amid broader industrials strength, contrasting FLS's post-earnings volatility. Risk profiles highlight FLS's higher debt-to-equity (78%) and beta, versus ITT's conservative 21% leverage and higher operating margins (18.9%). Market sentiment leans positive for ITT with strong buy ratings and loftier targets, positioning it better in energy and infrastructure cycles.
Tickeron’s AI models would currently favor ITT over FLS, driven by superior trend consistency, lower financial leverage, acquisition catalysts, and stronger relative performance metrics like YTD returns and analyst upside. While FLS offers valuation appeal via lower forward P/E, ITT's stability and growth trajectory provide higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileITT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +6.22% price change this week, while ITT (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.30%.
FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
ITT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FLS | ITT | FLS / ITT | |
| Capitalization | 9.98B | 16.9B | 59% |
| EBITDA | 710M | 860M | 83% |
| Gain YTD | 12.866 | 9.444 | 136% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.70 | 33.36 | 86% |
| Revenue | 4.65B | 4.24B | 110% |
| Total Cash | 792M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.89B | 3.97B | 48% |
FLS | ITT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLS's Valuation (28) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ITT (53). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
ITT's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (35). This means that ITT’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's SMR Rating (53) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ITT (65). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ITT (53). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
ITT's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (29). This means that ITT’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
| FLS | ITT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| FELE - FLS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ATMU - FLS | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| LECO - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ITT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| KMT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITT has been closely correlated with RBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ITT jumps, then RBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITT | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| RBC - ITT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| TKR - ITT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ATMU - ITT | 67% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| FSS - ITT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SPXC - ITT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||