FLS
Price
$55.39
Change
-$2.07 (-3.60%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
72 days until earnings call
NPO
Price
$200.29
Change
-$6.59 (-3.19%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.46B
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLS vs NPO

Header iconFLS vs NPO Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs NPOBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$55.39
Change-$2.07 (-3.60%)
Volume$2M
Capitalization5.99B
Enpro
Price$200.29
Change-$6.59 (-3.19%)
Volume$163.9K
Capitalization3.46B
FLS vs NPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. NPO commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a Hold and NPO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $57.46 vs. NPO: $206.88)
Brand notoriety: FLS and NPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 148% vs. NPO: 135%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $5.99B vs. NPO: $3.46B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $5.99B. NPO’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $3.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than NPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPO is a better buy in the short-term than FLS.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -8.40% price change this week, while NPO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +8.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

NPO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.33% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($5.99B) has a higher market cap than NPO($3.46B). NPO has higher P/E ratio than FLS: NPO (323.61) vs FLS (32.38). NPO YTD gains are higher at: 19.965 vs. FLS (-0.104). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 374M vs. NPO (177M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 546M vs. NPO (370M). NPO has less debt than FLS: NPO (657M) vs FLS (1.41B). FLS has higher revenues than NPO: FLS (4.32B) vs NPO (1.06B).
FLSNPOFLS / NPO
Capitalization5.99B3.46B173%
EBITDA374M177M211%
Gain YTD-0.10419.965-1%
P/E Ratio32.38323.6110%
Revenue4.32B1.06B408%
Total Cash546M370M148%
Total Debt1.41B657M214%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS vs NPO: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
NPO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7417
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
514
SMR RATING
1..100
5884
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NPO (71). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.

NPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (51). This means that NPO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NPO (84). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.

NPO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (49). This means that NPO’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NPO (99). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSNPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWY58.460.18
+0.31%
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
LQIG94.500.17
+0.18%
SPDR MarketAxess Inv Grd 400 Corp Bd ETF
ECML32.41-0.17
-0.52%
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
BKMC104.47-0.94
-0.89%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
DAT46.15-1.10
-2.34%
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-2.61%
ITT - FLS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
NPO - FLS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
EMR - FLS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
CR - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More

NPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPO has been closely correlated with RRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NPO jumps, then RRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPO
1D Price
Change %
NPO100%
-0.28%
RRX - NPO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
FSS - NPO
68%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
ITT - NPO
67%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
ROK - NPO
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
SXI - NPO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More