Ad is loading...
FLSPX vs NLSCX
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FLSPX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.44
Change-$0.23 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLSPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLSPX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. FLSPX (218M). FLSPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: FLSPX (0.80) vs NLSCX (0.00). FLSPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: FLSPX (10 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FLSPX (1.61). FLSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLSPX: NLSCX (1000) vs FLSPX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. FLSPX (-2.90). FLSPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. NLSCX (30.76).
| FLSPX | NLSCX | FLSPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.43 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.43 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.459 | -0.113 | 3,059% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 7.25B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.90 | 4.25 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.21 | 5.37 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 30.76 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.94 | 29.14 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...