Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLSPX vs NLSCX
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FLSPX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.14
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLSPX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLSPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.35B vs. FLSPX (221M). FLSPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: FLSPX (0.81) vs NLSCX (0.00). FLSPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: FLSPX (10 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FLSPX (1.87). FLSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLSPX: NLSCX (1000) vs FLSPX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. FLSPX (-3.05). FLSPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.11 vs. NLSCX (24.88).
| FLSPX | NLSCX | FLSPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.839 | 2.657 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 7.35B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.05 | 6.45 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | 13.57 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.11 | 24.88 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.01 | 32.51 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement