Ad is loading...
FLSPX vs NLSCX
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FLSPX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLSPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLSPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. FLSPX (208M). FLSPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: FLSPX (0.80) vs NLSCX (0.00). FLSPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: FLSPX (10 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FLSPX (1.61). FLSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLSPX: NLSCX (1000) vs FLSPX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. FLSPX (-4.23). FLSPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.05 vs. NLSCX (23.56).
| FLSPX | NLSCX | FLSPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.43 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.43 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.509 | -0.735 | 1,022% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208M | 7.13B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.23 | 4.28 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.97 | 7.87 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.05 | 23.56 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.21 | 27.43 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers