Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLSPX vs NLSCX
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FLSPX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLSPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLSPX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. FLSPX (234M). FLSPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: FLSPX (0.60) vs NLSCX (0.00). FLSPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: FLSPX (11 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FLSPX (1.87). FLSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLSPX: NLSCX (1000) vs FLSPX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. FLSPX (7.92). FLSPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.13 vs. NLSCX (21.64).
| FLSPX | NLSCX | FLSPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.264 | 5.144 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 7.58B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.92 | 10.52 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 13.21 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.13 | 21.64 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.41 | 37.87 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers