Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTEX vs LSDCX
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison
Open Charts FLTEX vs LSDCX
American Funds Limited Term Tx-Ex B F3
Price$15.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTEX vs. LSDCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTEX is a Hold and LSDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTEX has more cash in the bank: 5.66B vs. LSDCX (1.67B). FLTEX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: FLTEX (2.86) vs LSDCX (2.21). FLTEX was incepted earlier than LSDCX: FLTEX (9 years) vs LSDCX (17 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FLTEX (0.26). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FLTEX (33.00). LSDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLTEX: LSDCX (1000) vs FLTEX (1000000). LSDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. FLTEX (1.50). LSDCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.83 vs. FLTEX (-2.55).
| FLTEX | LSDCX | FLTEX / LSDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.26 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.27 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.681 | 2.689 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.66B | 1.67B | 338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 2.65 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.23 | 8.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | 2.83 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement