Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTEX vs LSDCX
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison
Open Charts FLTEX vs LSDCX
American Funds Limited Term Tx-Ex B F3
Price$15.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.67B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTEX vs. LSDCX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTEX is a Hold and LSDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTEX has more cash in the bank: 5.67B vs. LSDCX (1.65B). FLTEX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: FLTEX (2.87) vs LSDCX (2.20). FLTEX was incepted earlier than LSDCX: FLTEX (9 years) vs LSDCX (17 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FLTEX (0.27). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FLTEX (44.00). LSDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLTEX: LSDCX (1000) vs FLTEX (1000000). LSDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. FLTEX (1.70). LSDCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.94 vs. FLTEX (-2.38).
| FLTEX | LSDCX | FLTEX / LSDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.26 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.27 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.551 | 2.610 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.67B | 1.65B | 343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 2.20 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.70 | 2.58 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 8.98 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.38 | 2.94 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement