Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTEX vs LSDCX
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison
Open Charts FLTEX vs LSDCX
American Funds Limited Term Tx-Ex B F3
Price$15.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.45B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FLTEX vs LSDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTEX vs. LSDCX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTEX is a Hold and LSDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTEX has more cash in the bank: 5.45B vs. LSDCX (1.63B). FLTEX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: FLTEX (2.84) vs LSDCX (2.23). FLTEX was incepted earlier than LSDCX: FLTEX (8 years) vs LSDCX (17 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FLTEX (0.26). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FLTEX (33.00). LSDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLTEX: LSDCX (1000) vs FLTEX (1000000). LSDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. FLTEX (1.26). LSDCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.97 vs. FLTEX (-3.93).
| FLTEX | LSDCX | FLTEX / LSDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.26 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.27 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.719 | 1.317 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.45B | 1.63B | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.23 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.26 | 2.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.73 | 5.67 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.93 | 1.97 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement