FLTLF
Price
$33.14
Change
+$1.11 (+3.47%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
814.57M
HKXCY
Price
$51.53
Change
-$0.23 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.98B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs HKXCY

Header iconFLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs HKXCYBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$33.14
Change+$1.11 (+3.47%)
Volume$380
Capitalization814.57M
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$51.53
Change-$0.23 (-0.44%)
Volume$60.19K
Capitalization52.98B
FLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. HKXCY commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and HKXCY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $33.14 vs. HKXCY: $51.53)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and HKXCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 6% vs. HKXCY: 33%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $814.57M vs. HKXCY: $52.98B
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $814.57M. HKXCY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $52.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.47% price change this week, while HKXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.15% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($53B) has a higher market cap than FLTLF($815M). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than FLTLF: HKXCY (37.74) vs FLTLF (13.11). FLTLF YTD gains are higher at: 46.735 vs. HKXCY (39.211). HKXCY has less debt than FLTLF: HKXCY (1.76B) vs FLTLF (2.58B). HKXCY has higher revenues than FLTLF: HKXCY (16.4B) vs FLTLF (484M).
FLTLFHKXCYFLTLF / HKXCY
Capitalization815M53B2%
EBITDAN/A16.2B-
Gain YTD46.73539.211119%
P/E Ratio13.1137.7435%
Revenue484M16.4B3%
Total CashN/A265B-
Total Debt2.58B1.76B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs HKXCY: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
HKXCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7156
SMR RATING
1..100
975
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLTLF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (90). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (71). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLTLF (97). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (41). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLTLF (98). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNGRY32.530.29
+0.88%
NN Group NV
ESLOY140.200.63
+0.45%
EssilorLuxottica
LGRDY24.600.02
+0.08%
LeGrand SA
GTBIF5.10-0.10
-1.92%
Green Thumb Industries Inc.
LISMF0.08-0.01
-6.25%
Lithium South Dev Corp.

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and OPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and OPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
+3.47%
OPY - FLTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
HKXCY - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ABIT - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
EUXTF - FLTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNA - FLTLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
-0.44%
FUTU - HKXCY
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.07%
TIGR - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
HKXCF - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
TOP - HKXCY
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.38%
MQBKY - HKXCY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More