Ad is loading...
FLTLF
Price
$23.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
HKXCY
Price
$38.53
Change
-$0.55 (-1.41%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
101 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLTLF vs HKXCY

Header iconFLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs HKXCYBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$23.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$265
CapitalizationN/A
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$38.53
Change-$0.55 (-1.41%)
Volume$83.68K
CapitalizationN/A
FLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. HKXCY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and HKXCY is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $23.02 vs. HKXCY: $38.53)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and HKXCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 31% vs. HKXCY: 85%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $814.57M vs. HKXCY: $52.98B
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $814.57M. HKXCY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $52.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.97% price change this week, while HKXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($53B) has a higher market cap than FLTLF($815M). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than FLTLF: HKXCY (37.74) vs FLTLF (13.11). HKXCY YTD gains are higher at: 18.696 vs. FLTLF (15.414). HKXCY has less debt than FLTLF: HKXCY (1.76B) vs FLTLF (2.58B). HKXCY has higher revenues than FLTLF: HKXCY (16.4B) vs FLTLF (484M).
FLTLFHKXCYFLTLF / HKXCY
Capitalization815M53B2%
EBITDAN/A16.2B-
Gain YTD15.41418.69682%
P/E Ratio13.1137.7435%
Revenue484M16.4B3%
Total CashN/A265B-
Total Debt2.58B1.76B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs HKXCY: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
HKXCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLTLF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (91). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (100). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLTLF (93). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (45). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (91). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSDOX13.07-0.07
-0.53%
Morgan Stanley Emerging Mkt ex China C
IUAAX43.18-0.24
-0.55%
VY® Invesco Equity and Income A
ALGAX19.55-0.24
-1.21%
Alger International Opportunities A
SXPCX49.79-0.66
-1.31%
DWS S&P 500 Index C
JFNSX70.40-2.02
-2.79%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences S

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and OPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and OPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
N/A
OPY - FLTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
HKXCY - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
ABIT - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
EUXTF - FLTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNA - FLTLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
-1.41%
FUTU - HKXCY
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
TIGR - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
HKXCF - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
TOP - HKXCY
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.59%
MQBKY - HKXCY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
More