FLWS
Price
$4.75
Change
+$0.03 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
300.28M
34 days until earnings call
HZO
Price
$25.94
Change
+$0.18 (+0.70%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
552.9M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs HZO

Header iconFLWS vs HZO Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs HZOBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$4.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.64%)
Volume$170
Capitalization300.28M
MarineMax
Price$25.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization552.9M
FLWS vs HZO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. HZO commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a StrongBuy and HZO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $4.72 vs. HZO: $25.76)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. HZO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 103% vs. HZO: 93%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $300.28M vs. HZO: $552.9M
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $300.28M. HZO’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $552.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHZO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HZO is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HZO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HZO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HZO is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -16.46% price change this week, while HZO (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HZO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.07% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HZO($553M) has a higher market cap than FLWS($300M). HZO YTD gains are higher at: -11.019 vs. FLWS (-42.228). HZO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94.8M vs. FLWS (-144.3M). HZO has more cash in the bank: 151M vs. FLWS (46.5M). FLWS has less debt than HZO: FLWS (271M) vs HZO (1.27B). HZO has higher revenues than FLWS: HZO (2.32B) vs FLWS (1.69B).
FLWSHZOFLWS / HZO
Capitalization300M553M54%
EBITDA-144.3M94.8M-152%
Gain YTD-42.228-11.019383%
P/E RatioN/A11.15-
Revenue1.69B2.32B73%
Total Cash46.5M151M31%
Total Debt271M1.27B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs HZO: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
HZO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HZO's Valuation (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (83) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's SMR Rating (93) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (98) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (85) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (54) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSHZO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPCFF0.36N/A
N/A
Titan Logix Corp.
SOSCF0.25N/A
N/A
Deoleo SA
VOLVF28.74N/A
N/A
Volvo AB
ATZAF61.44-0.61
-0.99%
Aritzia Inc.
HLFFF8.50-0.64
-7.00%
Hellofresh SE

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
-2.68%
RUSHA - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
HVT - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
RH - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
HZO - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
LOW - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More

HZO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HZO has been loosely correlated with ONEW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HZO jumps, then ONEW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HZO
1D Price
Change %
HZO100%
-0.92%
ONEW - HZO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
AN - HZO
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
CWH - HZO
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
PAG - HZO
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
ABG - HZO
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
More