Advertisement
FLYW vs TOST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYW is a StrongBuy and TOST is a Buy.
| FLYW | TOST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLYW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TOST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FLYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TOST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLYW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLYW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TOST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLYW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while TOST (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLYW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
TOST is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.79% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CAIE | 26.86 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) | |||
| NVBW | 36.57 | N/A | +0.01% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) | |||
| BREE | 27.52 | -0.13 | -0.48% |
| MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BREE) | |||
| EFT | 10.38 | -0.07 | -0.67% |
| Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | |||
| EHCC | 24.10 | -0.25 | -1.04% |
| Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF | |||
FLYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLYW has been loosely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLYW jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYW | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| GLOB - FLYW | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| ACN - FLYW | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| CLVT - FLYW | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| EPAM - FLYW | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| CLSK - FLYW | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
TOST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOST has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOST jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOST | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| PAR - TOST | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.04% | ||
| COIN - TOST | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CLSK - TOST | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RIOT - TOST | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.90% | ||
| FLYW - TOST | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||