Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAG vs IWF
FMAG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FMAG vs IWF
Fidelity Magellan ETF
Price$33.26
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
Volume$308
Net Assets258.78M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$457.58
Change+$2.63 (+0.58%)
Volume$23.58K
Net Assets118.65B
FMAG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAG vs. IWF commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 119B vs. FMAG (259M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than FMAG: IWF (14.289) vs FMAG (7.461). FMAG was incepted earlier than IWF: FMAG (5 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FMAG (0.59). FMAG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| FMAG | IWF | FMAG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 7.461 | 14.289 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 259M | 119B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.18 | 328% |
| Turnover | 70.00 | 13.00 | 538% |
| Yield | 0.15 | 0.34 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 19 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FMAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAG has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAG jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAG | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| ETN - FMAG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| NVDA - FMAG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| MS - FMAG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ARES - FMAG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| APH - FMAG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||