Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAG vs IWF
FMAG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FMAG vs IWF
Fidelity Magellan ETF
Price$35.16
Change-$0.13 (-0.37%)
Volume$19.5K
Net Assets277.06M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$449.01
Change-$1.42 (-0.32%)
Volume$808.05K
Net Assets117.59B
FMAG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAG vs. IWF commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAG is a StrongBuy and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 118B vs. FMAG (277M). FMAG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: FMAG (13.639) vs IWF (12.039). FMAG was incepted earlier than IWF: FMAG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FMAG (0.59). FMAG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| FMAG | IWF | FMAG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 13.639 | 12.039 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 277M | 118B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.19 | 311% |
| Turnover | 62.00 | 12.00 | 517% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.40 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAG has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAG jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAG | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ETN - FMAG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| APH - FMAG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| NVDA - FMAG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ARES - FMAG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MSFT - FMAG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
More | ||||