Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAG vs SCHG
FMAG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FMAG vs SCHG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
Price$35.16
Change+$0.16 (+0.46%)
Volume$400
Net Assets268.1M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.40%)
Volume$60.38K
Net Assets45.77B
FMAG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAG vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAG is a Buy and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 45.8B vs. FMAG (268M). FMAG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FMAG (13.090) vs SCHG (8.075). FMAG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FMAG (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FMAG (0.59). FMAG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FMAG | SCHG | FMAG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 13.090 | 8.075 | 162% |
| Net Assets | 268M | 45.8B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.04 | 1,475% |
| Turnover | 62.00 | 3.00 | 2,067% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.39 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 74% | 15 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAG has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAG jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAG | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| WAB - FMAG | 76% Closely correlated | -6.38% | ||
| SNPS - FMAG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MS - FMAG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CDNS - FMAG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| TSM - FMAG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| META - SCHG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||