Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs FSKAX
FMAGX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$169.41
Change+$0.82 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.88B
FMAGX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. FSKAX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a StrongBuy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FMAGX (36.8B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FMAGX: FSKAX (1.09) vs FMAGX (0.17). FMAGX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FMAGX (62 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FMAGX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FMAGX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. FMAGX (5.96). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 114.47 vs. FMAGX (47.72).
| FMAGX | FSKAX | FMAGX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.01 | 3,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.01 | 3,733% |
| Fund Existence | 62 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.922 | 5.126 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.8B | 106B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.09 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 14.30 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.06 | 66.12 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.72 | 114.47 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.50 | 226.49 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement