Ad is loading...
FMAGX vs FSKAX
FMAGX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$152.12
Change+$0.89 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.03B
FMAGX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. FSKAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a Buy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. FMAGX (33.6B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FMAGX: FSKAX (1.25) vs FMAGX (0.23). FMAGX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FMAGX (62 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FMAGX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FMAGX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. FMAGX (1.30). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 100.08 vs. FMAGX (43.21).
| FMAGX | FSKAX | FMAGX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Fund Existence | 62 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.788 | -6.155 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.6B | 100B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.25 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.30 | 8.72 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.99 | 37.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.21 | 100.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.82 | 187.58 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...