Ad is loading...
FMAHX vs NMAAX
FMAHX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FMAHX vs NMAAX
Franklin MA Tax-Free Income Adv
Price$10.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.93M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.51M
FMAHX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAHX vs. NMAAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAHX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. FMAHX (333M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than FMAHX: NMAAX (3.28) vs FMAHX (3.11). FMAHX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: FMAHX (16 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). NMAAX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FMAHX (0.64). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FMAHX (25.42). FMAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: FMAHX (0) vs NMAAX (2500). NMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. FMAHX (-0.34). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.03 vs. FMAHX (-5.04).
| FMAHX | NMAAX | FMAHX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.79 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.964 | -1.740 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 439M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 3.28 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | -0.08 | 409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.86 | 5.44 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.04 | 1.03 | -488% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.82 | 7.66 | -24% |