FMBH
Price
$34.98
Change
-$1.48 (-4.06%)
Updated
Oct 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
874.94M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HIFS
Price
$253.66
Change
-$20.70 (-7.54%)
Updated
Oct 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
597.96M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs HIFS

Header iconFMBH vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts FMBH vs HIFSBanner chart's image
First Mid Bancshares
Price$34.98
Change-$1.48 (-4.06%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization874.94M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$253.66
Change-$20.70 (-7.54%)
Volume$157
Capitalization597.96M
FMBH vs HIFS Comparison Chart in %
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. HIFS commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Hold and HIFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBH: $36.46 vs. HIFS: $274.14)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 101% vs. HIFS: 140%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $874.94M vs. HIFS: $597.96M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $874.94M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $597.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIFS is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($875M) has a higher market cap than HIFS($598M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: HIFS (17.85) vs FMBH (10.36). HIFS YTD gains are higher at: 8.687 vs. FMBH (0.944). FMBH has more cash in the bank: 16.1M vs. HIFS (8.66M). FMBH has less debt than HIFS: FMBH (363M) vs HIFS (1.57B). FMBH has higher revenues than HIFS: FMBH (331M) vs HIFS (75.9M).
FMBHHIFSFMBH / HIFS
Capitalization875M598M146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.9448.68711%
P/E Ratio10.3617.8558%
Revenue331M75.9M436%
Total Cash16.1M8.66M186%
Total Debt363M1.57B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5573
SMR RATING
1..100
2555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HIFS's Valuation (75) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLASX40.170.34
+0.85%
Selected American Shares S
APHHX27.120.14
+0.52%
Artisan Global Equity Institutional
ITRIX26.95N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec I
AMONX24.95N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style N
CSMAX14.27N/A
N/A
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity A