FMBH
Price
$38.78
Change
-$0.14 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
759.93M
88 days until earnings call
IBCP
Price
$32.46
Change
-$0.38 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
529.95M
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs IBCP

Header iconFMBH vs IBCP Comparison
Open Charts FMBH vs IBCPBanner chart's image
First Mid Bancshares
Price$38.78
Change-$0.14 (-0.36%)
Volume$57.07K
Capitalization759.93M
Independent Bank
Price$32.46
Change-$0.38 (-1.16%)
Volume$55.03K
Capitalization529.95M
FMBH vs IBCP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. IBCP commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Hold and IBCP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBH: $38.78 vs. IBCP: $32.46)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 82% vs. IBCP: 76%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $759.93M vs. IBCP: $529.95M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $759.93M. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $529.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than IBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBCP is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($760M) has a higher market cap than IBCP($530M). FMBH has higher P/E ratio than IBCP: FMBH (10.10) vs IBCP (8.82). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 6.677 vs. IBCP (-5.338). IBCP has more cash in the bank: 58.6M vs. FMBH (16.1M). IBCP has less debt than FMBH: IBCP (129M) vs FMBH (409M). FMBH has higher revenues than IBCP: FMBH (275M) vs IBCP (200M).
FMBHIBCPFMBH / IBCP
Capitalization760M530M143%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.677-5.338-125%
P/E Ratio10.108.82114%
Revenue275M200M138%
Total Cash16.1M58.6M27%
Total Debt409M129M317%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4820
SMR RATING
1..100
1820
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBCP's Valuation (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (96). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (48). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (20). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (58). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (72). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMVRX16.500.15
+0.92%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R
BPAIX33.280.15
+0.45%
Boston Partners All Cap Value Instl
PRGTX23.810.05
+0.21%
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
RICIX11.52-0.01
-0.09%
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq I
PETGX14.41-0.10
-0.69%
Gabelli Pet Parents'™ A

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-0.36%
TCBK - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
CTBI - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
STBA - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
EQBK - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
BY - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More