FMBH
Price
$52.52
Change
-$0.06 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.4B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSBK
Price
$45.01
Change
+$0.58 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
352.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs TSBK

FMBH vs TSBK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? First Mid Bancshares (FMBH) vs. Timberland Bancorp (TSBK) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • First Mid Bancshares (FMBH) and Timberland Bancorp (TSBK) are both regional community banks, but they operate in different geographic markets with distinct economic exposure profiles.
  • FMBH has pursued an active acquisition strategy in recent years, expanding its footprint across Illinois and Missouri, while TSBK remains more concentrated in the Pacific Northwest.
  • Both stocks have shown relative resilience in the current rate environment, but differences in loan portfolio composition and deposit bases create diverging risk profiles.
  • Recent market sentiment has favored regional banks with strong net interest margins and disciplined credit underwriting — areas where both institutions have posted competitive metrics.
  • Tickeron's AI-driven analysis evaluates trend consistency, volatility patterns, and fundamental positioning to help identify which stock may be better suited for current market conditions.

Introduction

Regional bank stocks have drawn renewed attention from investors navigating the current interest rate cycle and evolving credit conditions. FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) and TSBK (Timberland Bancorp, Inc.) represent two community-focused financial institutions with solid balance sheets and long operating histories. While both operate in the small-to-mid-cap banking space, their geographic footprints, growth strategies, and market positioning differ meaningfully. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across key dimensions — including recent performance, business model dynamics, and AI-driven trend analysis — offering traders and investors a data-grounded perspective on relative positioning.

FMBH Overview and Recent Performance

First Mid Bancshares, headquartered in Mattoon, Illinois, operates as the holding company for First Mid Bank & Trust, providing a full suite of commercial and retail banking, wealth management, and insurance services. With a footprint spanning Illinois, Missouri, and beyond, FMBH has grown significantly through mergers and acquisitions in recent years, most notably integrating several community banks to expand its asset base and market share. In recent weeks, FMBH has traded with moderate volatility, reflecting broader regional banking sector dynamics. The company's net interest margin (NIM — the difference between interest income earned and interest paid, relative to earning assets) has held up reasonably well amid the elevated rate environment. Investors have reacted cautiously to the bank's loan portfolio composition, which includes commercial real estate exposure — an area under heightened scrutiny industry-wide. Nevertheless, First Mid's tangible book value has continued to trend positively, supported by disciplined capital management and steady deposit growth. In recent market activity, the stock has demonstrated relative stability compared to more volatile regional bank peers, though trading volumes have reflected ongoing sector-wide caution.

TSBK Overview and Recent Performance

Timberland Bancorp, based in Hoquiam, Washington, serves as the holding company for Timberland Bank, a community-oriented institution that has operated in the Pacific Northwest for over a century. The bank provides commercial and retail banking services across Washington state, with a particular focus on residential and commercial real estate lending. Unlike FMBH, TSBK has taken a more organic growth path, expanding its presence without the same frequency of acquisitions. In recent weeks, TSBK has attracted attention for its conservative underwriting standards and strong asset quality metrics — qualities that have become increasingly valued in the current credit cycle. The bank's efficiency ratio, a key measure of cost control relative to revenue, has remained competitive within its peer group. Market sentiment surrounding TSBK has been relatively stable, with the stock benefiting from its reputation as a well-managed community bank with a loyal deposit base. The Pacific Northwest economy, driven by technology, trade, and construction activity, provides a distinct macroeconomic backdrop that differs notably from the Midwest and Plains exposure that defines much of FMBH's operating environment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a broader ecosystem of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers across the market. These bots are not randomly listed; only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this section. The bots featured operate across varied trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, and short-term pattern recognition — with some delivering annualized returns exceeding 40%, while others focus on consistency with lower drawdowns. Each bot comes with transparent performance statistics, trade history, and the specific tickers it trades, allowing users to evaluate fit before making any decision. For investors seeking data-driven assistance in navigating comparisons like FMBH versus TSBK, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide actionable, algorithmically generated insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing FMBH and TSBK, several structural differences come into focus. First Mid Bancshares operates with a more diversified geographic and service offering — its wealth management and insurance segments provide fee income streams that partially offset net interest income sensitivity. TSBK, by contrast, is a purer play on traditional community banking, with a heavier emphasis on real estate lending. On the growth front, FMBH's acquisition-driven strategy has expanded its asset base more rapidly, though integration risks and goodwill on the balance sheet warrant monitoring. TSBK's organic growth path has resulted in a cleaner, more easily predictable earnings trajectory. From a risk perspective, both banks maintain strong Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1 — a key measure of a bank's core capital strength relative to risk-weighted assets) ratios, but their loan book concentrations differ: FMBH carries more agricultural and Midwestern commercial exposure, while TSBK is more tied to Pacific Northwest real estate cycles. Market sentiment in recent weeks has slightly favored the steadier, less acquisition-dependent profile, though FMBH's scale advantages and fee income diversification remain compelling counterpoints.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, volatility signatures, and relative positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis appears to lean toward recognizing slightly more favorable conditions in TSBK at this juncture. The stock's steadier trend profile, conservative credit culture, and cleaner organic growth narrative align well with the risk-off undercurrents that have characterized the regional banking sector in recent months. That said, FMBH demonstrates meaningful strengths in diversification and scale that could prove advantageous if economic conditions stabilize and rate expectations shift. The AI's probabilistic assessment does not represent a definitive call but rather a data-informed tilt based on how each stock's pattern characteristics compare against prevailing market dynamics. Investors using Tickeron's AI tools can monitor how these relative signals evolve as new data emerges, ensuring decisions remain anchored to the most current analysis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FMBH vs. TSBK commentary
Jul 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Buy and TSBK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2026
Stock price -- (FMBH: $52.52 vs. TSBK: $45.01)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and TSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 64% vs. TSBK: 36%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $1.4B vs. TSBK: $352.34M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.4B. TSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $352.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSBK is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TSBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSBK is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.29% price change this week, while TSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($1.4B) has a higher market cap than TSBK($352M). FMBH has higher P/E ratio than TSBK: FMBH (13.03) vs TSBK (11.54). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 36.253 vs. TSBK (27.553). TSBK has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. FMBH (16.1M). TSBK has less debt than FMBH: TSBK (22.9M) vs FMBH (383M). FMBH has higher revenues than TSBK: FMBH (355M) vs TSBK (81.6M).
FMBHTSBKFMBH / TSBK
Capitalization1.4B352M397%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.25327.553132%
P/E Ratio13.0311.54113%
Revenue355M81.6M435%
Total Cash16.1M23.2M69%
Total Debt383M22.9M1,672%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs TSBK: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
TSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5225
SMR RATING
1..100
5161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3229
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSBK's Valuation (51) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TSBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TSBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TSBK’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TSBK (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to TSBK’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TSBK (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to TSBK’s over the last 12 months.

TSBK's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TSBK’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHTSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAFAX44.89N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Adv
FCHKX63.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
CRMSX15.45N/A
N/A
CRM Small Cap Value Inv
BRULX19.05N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R3
FKGRX140.50N/A
N/A
Franklin Growth A

TSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSBK has been closely correlated with FBIZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSBK jumps, then FBIZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSBK
1D Price
Change %
TSBK100%
+1.31%
FBIZ - TSBK
77%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
FMBH - TSBK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
IBCP - TSBK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
ORRF - TSBK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
SRCE - TSBK
73%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More