FMBL
Price
$5575.00
Change
+$15.00 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
637.7M
8 days until earnings call
FMCB
Price
$1050.00
Change
+$40.00 (+3.96%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
748.84M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMBL vs FMCB

Header iconFMBL vs FMCB Comparison
Open Charts FMBL vs FMCBBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)
Price$5575.00
Change+$15.00 (+0.27%)
Volume$53
Capitalization637.7M
Farmers & Merchants Ban
Price$1050.00
Change+$40.00 (+3.96%)
Volume$1
Capitalization748.84M
FMBL vs FMCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBL vs. FMCB commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBL is a Hold and FMCB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBL: $5575.00 vs. FMCB: $1050.00)
Brand notoriety: FMBL and FMCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBL: 100% vs. FMCB: 1%
Market capitalization -- FMBL: $637.7M vs. FMCB: $748.84M
FMBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $637.7M. FMCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $748.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCB is a better buy in the long-term than FMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCB’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMCB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the short-term than FMCB.

Price Growth

FMBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while FMCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBL is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

FMCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCB($749M) has a higher market cap than FMBL($638M). FMCB has higher P/E ratio than FMBL: FMCB (9.18) vs FMBL (7.14). FMCB YTD gains are higher at: -0.943 vs. FMBL (-2.193). FMBL has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. FMCB (68.3M). FMCB has less debt than FMBL: FMCB (10.3M) vs FMBL (1B). FMBL has higher revenues than FMCB: FMBL (311M) vs FMCB (211M).
FMBLFMCBFMBL / FMCB
Capitalization638M749M85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.193-0.943232%
P/E Ratio7.149.1878%
Revenue311M211M147%
Total Cash87.7M68.3M128%
Total Debt1B10.3M9,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBL vs FMCB: Fundamental Ratings
FMBL
FMCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
1917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMBL's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCB (67). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCB’s over the last 12 months.

FMCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMBL (100). This means that FMCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMCB's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (19). This means that FMCB’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMCB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (51). This means that FMCB’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCB (50). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBLFMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
7%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
12%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDLMY26.520.62
+2.39%
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
SCL63.870.30
+0.47%
Stepan Co
CAC44.050.16
+0.36%
Camden National Corp
ADDDF247.25-2.50
-1.00%
adidas AG
LPSN1.33-0.05
-3.62%
LivePerson

FMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBL and CBHC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBL and CBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBL
1D Price
Change %
FMBL100%
+0.27%
CBHC - FMBL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - FMBL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - FMBL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
HTLF - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More

FMCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMCB and CMUV have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMCB and CMUV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCB
1D Price
Change %
FMCB100%
+3.96%
CMUV - FMCB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
EDVR - FMCB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
CBBI - FMCB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFST - FMCB
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
FMBL - FMCB
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More