FMBM
Price
$27.14
Change
-$0.15 (-0.55%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
96.54M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HIFS
Price
$259.68
Change
+$6.24 (+2.46%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
566.43M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBM vs HIFS

Header iconFMBM vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts FMBM vs HIFSBanner chart's image
F & M Bank
Price$27.14
Change-$0.15 (-0.55%)
Volume$11.64K
Capitalization96.54M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$259.68
Change+$6.24 (+2.46%)
Volume$70.69K
Capitalization566.43M
FMBM vs HIFS Comparison Chart in %
FMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBM vs. HIFS commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBM is a Hold and HIFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBM: $27.14 vs. HIFS: $259.68)
Brand notoriety: FMBM and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBM: 320% vs. HIFS: 92%
Market capitalization -- FMBM: $96.54M vs. HIFS: $566.43M
FMBM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $96.54M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $566.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBM is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIFS is a better buy in the short-term than FMBM.

Price Growth

FMBM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIFS($566M) has a higher market cap than FMBM($96.5M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than FMBM: HIFS (16.91) vs FMBM (11.36). FMBM YTD gains are higher at: 39.225 vs. HIFS (2.956). FMBM has more cash in the bank: 21.8M vs. HIFS (8.66M). FMBM has less debt than HIFS: FMBM (7M) vs HIFS (1.57B). HIFS has higher revenues than FMBM: HIFS (75.9M) vs FMBM (48.3M).
FMBMHIFSFMBM / HIFS
Capitalization96.5M566M17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.2252.9561,327%
P/E Ratio11.3616.9167%
Revenue48.3M75.9M64%
Total Cash21.8M8.66M252%
Total Debt7M1.57B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBM vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
FMBM
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4576
SMR RATING
1..100
5755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3490

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMBM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

FMBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBM’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's SMR Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBM (57) in the null industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FMBM’s over the last 12 months.

FMBM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBM’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

FMBM's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBM’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBMHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CISIX56.85N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
NCGFX71.08N/A
N/A
New Covenant Growth
PMDDX18.84N/A
N/A
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
MSVIX13.15N/A
N/A
MetLife Small Company Equity Inst
HMCNX15.09N/A
N/A
Harbor Mid Cap Investor

FMBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBM and PDLB have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBM and PDLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBM
1D Price
Change %
FMBM100%
-0.55%
PDLB - FMBM
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
NWFL - FMBM
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
HIFS - FMBM
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
SMBC - FMBM
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
CFFN - FMBM
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+2.46%
BY - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
TRMK - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
MBWM - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
STBA - HIFS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
FMBH - HIFS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
More