Advertisement
FMCQF vs FMS
To understand the difference between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMCQF) vs. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA - ADR (FMS) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMCQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMCQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FMCQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FMCQF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +6.92% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +104.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +100.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (+2.41% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| FMCQF | FMS | FMCQF / FMS | |
| Capitalization | 15.6B | 14.8B | 105% |
| EBITDA | 3.17B | 3.17B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 14.378 | 119% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.17 | 19.13 | 105% |
| Revenue | 19.5B | 19.5B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.72B | 1.72B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 11B | 11B | 100% |
FMCQF | FMS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMCQF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (86) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (54) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (56) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
| FMCQF | FMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADBG | 11.03 | 0.05 | +0.46% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | |||
| BSEP | 47.93 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| BEMB | 54.09 | -0.14 | -0.26% |
| iShares J.P. Morgan Brd USD Emr MktBdETF | |||
| EGGS | 42.72 | -0.45 | -1.04% |
| NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | |||
| UTES | 81.78 | -1.10 | -1.33% |
| Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | |||
FMCQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCQF has been loosely correlated with DNTCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCQF jumps, then DNTCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMCQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMCQF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DNTCF - FMCQF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FMS - FMCQF | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| DVA - FMCQF | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| THC - FMCQF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| RMYHY - FMCQF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||