FMCQF
Price
$48.38
Change
-$1.57 (-3.14%)
Updated
Feb 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
FMS
Price
$23.09
Change
+$0.15 (+0.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.2B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMCQF vs FMS

Header iconFMCQF vs FMS Comparison
Open Charts FMCQF vs FMSBanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$48.38
Change-$1.57 (-3.14%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization13.88B
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$23.09
Change+$0.15 (+0.65%)
Volume$540.9K
Capitalization11.2B
FMCQF vs FMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCQF vs. FMS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To understand the difference between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMCQF) vs. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA - ADR (FMS) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCQF: $48.38 vs. FMS: $23.09)
Brand notoriety: FMCQF and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCQF: 11% vs. FMS: 206%
Market capitalization -- FMCQF: $13.88B vs. FMS: $11.2B
FMCQF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $13.88B. FMS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $11.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FMCQF and FMS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FMCQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.15% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCQF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than FMS($11.2B). FMCQF has higher P/E ratio than FMS: FMCQF (22.03) vs FMS (20.80). FMCQF YTD gains are higher at: 6.600 vs. FMS (1.988). FMCQF (3.35B) and FMS (3.21B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. FMCQF (1.22B). FMS has less debt than FMCQF: FMS (12.1B) vs FMCQF (13.3B). FMCQF (19.6B) and FMS (19.5B) have equivalent revenues.
FMCQFFMSFMCQF / FMS
Capitalization13.9B11.2B124%
EBITDA3.35B3.21B104%
Gain YTD6.6001.988332%
P/E Ratio22.0320.80106%
Revenue19.6B19.5B101%
Total Cash1.22B1.54B79%
Total Debt13.3B12.1B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCQF vs FMS: Fundamental Ratings
FMCQF
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8282
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (14) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMCQF (16) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMCQF (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (82) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMCQF (82) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (60) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLAX24.050.02
+0.06%
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
IOCT30.53-0.12
-0.38%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
INTF30.87-0.13
-0.42%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
DTH40.52-0.28
-0.69%
WisdomTree International High Div ETF
RSP179.82-2.56
-1.40%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF

FMCQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCQF has been loosely correlated with DNTCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCQF jumps, then DNTCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCQF
1D Price
Change %
FMCQF100%
N/A
DNTCF - FMCQF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FMS - FMCQF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
DVA - FMCQF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
THC - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
EVGRF - FMCQF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More