Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCSX vs FSMDX
FMCSX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FMCSX vs FSMDX
FMCSX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCSX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCSX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FMCSX (6.99B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FMCSX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FMCSX (0.69). FMCSX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FMCSX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). FMCSX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FMCSX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. FMCSX (1.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.56 vs. FMCSX (48.35).
| FMCSX | FSMDX | FMCSX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.03 | 3,160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.03 | 3,160% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.387 | 2.724 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.99B | 40.4B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.14 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 11.45 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 43.91 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.35 | 75.56 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.33 | 111.33 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers