FMCXF
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.06 (+2.74%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
SOUHY
Price
$8.77
Change
-$0.06 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.97B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMCXF vs SOUHY

Header iconFMCXF vs SOUHY Comparison
Open Charts FMCXF vs SOUHYBanner chart's image
Foran Mining
Price$2.25
Change+$0.06 (+2.74%)
Volume$122.73K
Capitalization1.27B
South32
Price$8.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.68%)
Volume$250.88K
Capitalization7.97B
FMCXF vs SOUHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCXF vs. SOUHY commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCXF is a Buy and SOUHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCXF: $2.25 vs. SOUHY: $8.77)
Brand notoriety: FMCXF and SOUHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCXF: 52% vs. SOUHY: 310%
Market capitalization -- FMCXF: $1.22B vs. SOUHY: $7.97B
FMCXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.22B. SOUHY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOUHY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOUHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than SOUHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMCXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOUHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SOUHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the short-term than SOUHY.

Price Growth

FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while SOUHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.53% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOUHY($7.97B) has a higher market cap than FMCXF($1.27B). SOUHY YTD gains are higher at: -15.154 vs. FMCXF (-17.582). SOUHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 689M vs. FMCXF (6.52M). SOUHY has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. FMCXF (397M). FMCXF has less debt than SOUHY: FMCXF (410M) vs SOUHY (1.65B). SOUHY has higher revenues than FMCXF: SOUHY (6.1B) vs FMCXF (0).
FMCXFSOUHYFMCXF / SOUHY
Capitalization1.27B7.97B16%
EBITDA6.52M689M1%
Gain YTD-17.582-15.154116%
P/E RatioN/A25.06-
Revenue06.1B-
Total Cash397M1.61B25%
Total Debt410M1.65B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCXF vs SOUHY: Fundamental Ratings
FMCXF
SOUHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
711
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3481
SMR RATING
1..100
9188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5581
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOUHY (94). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOUHY (81). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (91). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SOUHY (81). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCXF (100). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMCXFSOUHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBLCX55.36N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced C
IJMAX13.54N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A
FMFTX91.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials M
PSIJX8.72N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap Growth I J
FCGPX20.64-0.19
-0.91%
NYLI PineStone Global Equity Class P

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
+2.74%
TECK - FMCXF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
SOUHY - FMCXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
BHP - FMCXF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
RIO - FMCXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
More

SOUHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOUHY has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOUHY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOUHY
1D Price
Change %
SOUHY100%
-0.68%
BHP - SOUHY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
GLNCY - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
RIO - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
GLCNF - SOUHY
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.41%
VALE - SOUHY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
More