Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFOX
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFOX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.70
Change-$0.16 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$7.75
Change-$0.09 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07M
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFOX (41.1M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFOX (2.02) vs FMDRX (1.79). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFOX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFOX (8 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFOX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. LZFOX (-20.19). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 26.65 vs. LZFOX (-14.89).
| FMDRX | LZFOX | FMDRX / LZFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 3.21 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.535 | -6.936 | -210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.13B | 41.1M | 22,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.02 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | -20.19 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.02 | -19.51 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.65 | -14.89 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement