Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFOX
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFOX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.58
Change+$0.18 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.38B
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$8.90
Change+$0.09 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.17M
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFOX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.38B vs. LZFOX (47.2M). LZFOX (1.91) and FMDRX (1.89) have matching dividends . FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFOX: FMDRX (12 years) vs LZFOX (8 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFOX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. LZFOX (-12.91). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.45 vs. LZFOX (10.93).
| FMDRX | LZFOX | FMDRX / LZFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 3.21 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.417 | 6.874 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 47.2M | 19,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.91 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | -12.91 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.56 | -4.16 | -542% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.45 | 10.93 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement