Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs NQGCX
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs NQGCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.19
Change+$0.10 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.32B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$40.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.56M
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. NQGCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Buy and NQGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.32B vs. NQGCX (147M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: FMDRX (1.98) vs NQGCX (1.22). FMDRX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: FMDRX (12 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: NQGCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.43 vs. FMDRX (4.44). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 82.60 vs. FMDRX (36.42).
| FMDRX | NQGCX | FMDRX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.02 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.336 | 18.084 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.32B | 147M | 6,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.22 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | 21.43 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.59 | 49.08 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 82.60 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.23 | 74.72 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement