Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs NQGCX
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs NQGCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.58
Change+$0.18 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.38B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$40.65
Change+$0.23 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.53M
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. NQGCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and NQGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.38B vs. NQGCX (147M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: FMDRX (1.89) vs NQGCX (1.17). FMDRX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: FMDRX (12 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: NQGCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.26 vs. FMDRX (4.28). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.04 vs. FMDRX (39.19).
| FMDRX | NQGCX | FMDRX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.02 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.044 | 18.727 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 147M | 6,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.17 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 19.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 60.96 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.19 | 84.04 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.61 | 85.52 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement