Ad is loading...
FMDRX vs NQGCX
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs NQGCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$30.03
Change+$0.31 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.61B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$35.90
Change+$0.60 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.11M
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. NQGCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a StrongBuy and NQGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 8.61B vs. NQGCX (130M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: FMDRX (2.03) vs NQGCX (1.41). FMDRX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: FMDRX (12 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.47 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: NQGCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.33 vs. FMDRX (-3.92). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 83.84 vs. FMDRX (38.61).
| FMDRX | NQGCX | FMDRX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.86 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.02 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.590 | 2.440 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.61B | 130M | 6,622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.41 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.92 | 10.33 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.34 | 23.01 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.61 | 83.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.73 | 48.75 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...