Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs NQGCX
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs NQGCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.39B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$39.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.96M
FMDRX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. NQGCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Buy and NQGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. NQGCX (145M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: FMDRX (1.94) vs NQGCX (1.22). FMDRX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: FMDRX (12 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: NQGCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. FMDRX (5.80). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 86.86 vs. FMDRX (41.68).
| FMDRX | NQGCX | FMDRX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.02 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.755 | 16.419 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.39B | 145M | 6,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.22 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 19.61 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.29 | 54.36 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.68 | 86.86 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.88 | 71.17 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement