FMELF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
FSTTF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

FMELF vs FSTTF

Header iconFMELF vs FSTTF Comparison
Open Charts FMELF vs FSTTFBanner chart's image
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85K
CapitalizationN/A
First Tellurium
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$36.08K
CapitalizationN/A
FMELF vs FSTTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMELF vs. FSTTF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMELF is a Hold and FSTTF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FMELF: $0.02 vs. FSTTF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: FMELF and FSTTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMELF: 95% vs. FSTTF: 65%
Market capitalization -- FMELF: $8.53M vs. FSTTF: $7.49M
FMELF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.53M. FSTTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMELF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSTTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMELF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FMELF and FSTTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSTTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSTTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

FMELF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSTTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.40% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than FSTTF($7.49M). FSTTF YTD gains are higher at: 67.797 vs. FMELF (-94.286). FSTTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
FMELFFSTTFFMELF / FSTTF
Capitalization8.53M7.49M114%
EBITDA-6.65M-1.74M382%
Gain YTD-94.28667.797-139%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A859K-
Total DebtN/A183K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSTTF: Fundamental Ratings
FSTTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMELFFSTTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIERX38.95N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity I
MISIX15.41N/A
N/A
Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp I
MTINX20.15-0.49
-2.35%
NYLI Income Builder Investor Class
GXXCX8.56-0.24
-2.73%
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders C
FCFMX19.17-0.62
-3.13%
Fidelity Series Total Market Index

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and BTUMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and BTUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
N/A
BTUMF - FMELF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRG - FMELF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
10%
Poorly correlated
+7.38%
VMSSF - FMELF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSTTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSTTF and VMSXF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSTTF and VMSXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTTF
1D Price
Change %
FSTTF100%
+7.38%
VMSXF - FSTTF
14%
Poorly correlated
-17.58%
PUMXF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMELF - FSTTF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLX - FSTTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
RGCCF - FSTTF
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
More