Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGACX
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Gr
Price$17.09
Change+$0.15 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.90
Change+$0.78 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FMFMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FMFMX (1.36B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMFMX (0.51) vs RGACX (0.07). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMFMX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.01). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMFMX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. FMFMX (-12.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.06 vs. FMFMX (6.87).
| FMFMX | RGACX | FMFMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.417 | 10.988 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.07 | 693% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.08 | 10.28 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.43 | 58.08 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.87 | 47.06 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.50 | 82.67 | 72% |