Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMFMX vs RGAFX
FMFMX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMFMX vs RGAFX
FMFMX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMFMX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFMX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMFMX (1.55B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than RGAFX: FMFMX (0.70) vs RGAFX (0.46). FMFMX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FMFMX (12 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). RGAFX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FMFMX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.83 vs. FMFMX (-2.24). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.80 vs. FMFMX (-5.12).
| FMFMX | RGAFX | FMFMX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.875 | 7.486 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.46 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.24 | -1.83 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.60 | 42.98 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.12 | 12.80 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.73 | 104.54 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement