The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
IWD | |
Gain YTD | 11.776 |
Net Assets | 65.1B |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 |
Turnover | 15.00 |
Yield | 1.73 |
Fund Existence | 25 years |
IWD | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NML | 8.21 | 0.07 | +0.86% |
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund | |||
GDOC | 34.14 | 0.20 | +0.60% |
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF | |||
EUFN | 33.23 | 0.15 | +0.45% |
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | |||
BUFT | 24.20 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF | |||
AGIX | 37.25 | -0.59 | -1.56% |
KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.