Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMISX vs NMAAX
FMISX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FMISX vs NMAAX
Franklin MA Tax-Free Income A1
Price$10.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.42M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.87
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.36M
FMISX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMISX vs. NMAAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMISX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. FMISX (330M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than FMISX: NMAAX (3.42) vs FMISX (3.07). FMISX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: FMISX (40 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). NMAAX (0.80) and FMISX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FMISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.42 vs. NMAAX (14.00). NMAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FMISX (4%) vs FMISX (4%). FMISX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: FMISX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). FMISX (-2.18) and NMAAX (-2.26) have marching annual gain over last year. NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.70 vs. FMISX (-7.07).
| FMISX | NMAAX | FMISX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.80 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.80 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.892 | -2.308 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 89% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 411M | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.42 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.18 | -2.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.34 | 3.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.07 | -3.70 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.30 | 6.72 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement