Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMMFX vs LTGRX
FMMFX vs LTGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. LTGRX (93.2M). FMMFX pays higher dividends than LTGRX: FMMFX (4.59) vs LTGRX (2.98). FMMFX was incepted earlier than LTGRX: FMMFX (5 years) vs LTGRX (14 years). LTGRX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FMMFX (0.36). FMMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. LTGRX (32.26). LTGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMMFX: LTGRX (0) vs FMMFX (250). FMMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. LTGRX (6.02). LTGRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.15 vs. FMMFX (-1.34).
| FMMFX | LTGRX | FMMFX / LTGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.67 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 2.24 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.588 | 5.956 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 93.2M | 13,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 2.98 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 6.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.98 | 14.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.34 | 3.15 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement