Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMOTX vs MDXBX
FMOTX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FMOTX vs MDXBX
Nuveen MO Municipal Bond A
Price$10.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.62M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
FMOTX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMOTX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMOTX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. FMOTX (488M). FMOTX (3.52) and MDXBX (3.46) have matching dividends . FMOTX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FMOTX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FMOTX (0.79) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FMOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FMOTX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. FMOTX (-0.05). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. FMOTX (1.92).
| FMOTX | MDXBX | FMOTX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.49 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.53 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.461 | -1.677 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 2.28B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.05 | -0.03 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.03 | 6.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.92 | 2.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.48 | 13.12 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement