Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMOTX vs MDXBX
FMOTX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FMOTX vs MDXBX
Nuveen MO Municipal Bond A
Price$10.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.62M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FMOTX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMOTX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jun 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMOTX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FMOTX (488M). FMOTX (3.53) and MDXBX (3.44) have matching dividends . FMOTX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FMOTX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FMOTX (0.79) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FMOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FMOTX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. FMOTX (-0.36). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.67 vs. FMOTX (1.61).
| FMOTX | MDXBX | FMOTX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.49 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.53 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.328 | -2.180 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 2.27B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.36 | 0.40 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.62 | 5.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.61 | 2.67 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.28 | 12.54 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers