Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMOTX vs TFBIX
FMOTX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FMOTX vs TFBIX
Nuveen MO Municipal Bond A
Price$10.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.62M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FMOTX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMOTX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMOTX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FMOTX (488M). FMOTX (3.53) and TFBIX (3.52) have matching dividends . FMOTX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FMOTX (38 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FMOTX (0.79) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). FMOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. TFBIX (17.30). FMOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FMOTX (2500) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. FMOTX (-0.45). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.26 vs. FMOTX (1.65).
| FMOTX | TFBIX | FMOTX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.41 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.41 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.038 | -1.647 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 2.27B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.52 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 0.39 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.74 | 8.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.65 | 3.26 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement