Advertisement
FMS vs OPCH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and OPCH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPCH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OPCH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPCH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- OPCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
OPCH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
| FMS | OPCH | FMS / OPCH | |
| Capitalization | 14.1B | 4.58B | 308% |
| EBITDA | 3.17B | 404M | 785% |
| Gain YTD | 9.249 | 21.552 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.51 | 22.38 | 83% |
| Revenue | 19.5B | 5.37B | 363% |
| Total Cash | 1.49B | 199M | 747% |
| Total Debt | 10.8B | 1.23B | 879% |
FMS | OPCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMS's Valuation (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for OPCH (75) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than OPCH’s over the last 12 months.
OPCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that OPCH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
OPCH's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (85) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that OPCH’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as OPCH (79) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to OPCH’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as OPCH (67) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to OPCH’s over the last 12 months.
| FMS | OPCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 11 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GBPCNY | 9.66 | 0.06 | +0.68% |
| United Kingdom Pound - China Yuan | |||
| AUDUSD | 0.65 | 0.00 | +0.43% |
| Australian Dollar - United States Dollar | |||
| NZDAUD | 0.91 | 0.00 | +0.01% |
| New Zealand Dollar - Australian Dollar | |||
| CHFRUB | 98.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Switzerland Franc - Russia Ruble | |||
| GOVI | 27.39 | -0.09 | -0.33% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
OPCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPCH has been loosely correlated with CHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPCH jumps, then CHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPCH | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| CHE - OPCH | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| DVA - OPCH | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| USPH - OPCH | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.69% | ||
| FMS - OPCH | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| PNTG - OPCH | 28% Poorly correlated | +7.79% | ||
More | ||||