It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -2.26% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
FMST | LIN | FMST / LIN | |
Capitalization | 12.4M | 223B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 12.2B | - |
Gain YTD | -22.000 | 10.346 | -213% |
P/E Ratio | 40.24 | 36.81 | 109% |
Revenue | N/A | 32.9B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 4.66B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 20.3B | - |
FMST | LIN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMST's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FMST’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMST (93) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than FMST’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (54) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMST (95) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMST’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMST (91) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMST’s over the last 12 months.
FMST's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FMST’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
FMST | LIN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago39% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago38% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago44% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago87% | 11 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago43% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FMST and LIN have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMST and LIN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FMST | 100% | -1.52% | ||
LIN - FMST | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
ESI - FMST | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
LWLG - FMST | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
ORGN - FMST | 8% Poorly correlated | -12.80% | ||
AVNT - FMST | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More |