Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUFX vs HBLYX
FMUFX vs HBLYX Comparison
Open Charts FMUFX vs HBLYX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
Price$15.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
Hartford Balanced Income Y
Price$15.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
FMUFX vs HBLYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUFX vs. HBLYX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUFX is a Buy and HBLYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FMUFX (1.36B). HBLYX pays higher dividends than FMUFX: HBLYX (3.51) vs FMUFX (2.08). FMUFX was incepted earlier than HBLYX: FMUFX (18 years) vs HBLYX (19 years). FMUFX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUFX (23.00). FMUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: FMUFX (1500) vs HBLYX (250000). FMUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. HBLYX (3.57). FMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.45 vs. HBLYX (17.12).
| FMUFX | HBLYX | FMUFX / HBLYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.67 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.110 | 8.047 | 51% |
| Front Load | 1% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 3.51 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.52 | 3.57 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.79 | 16.51 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.45 | 17.12 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.70 | 50.58 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement