It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMZNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMZNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FMZNF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +4.24% price change this week, while VS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.51%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.
VS is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (+0.47% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
FMZNF | VS | FMZNF / VS | |
Capitalization | 577M | 11.2M | 5,152% |
EBITDA | 4.61M | -4.21M | -109% |
Gain YTD | 30.370 | 4.091 | 742% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 106M | 230K | 46,087% |
Total Cash | N/A | 2.43M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 0 | - |
FMZNF | VS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VS's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FMZNF (44). This means that VS’s stock grew similarly to FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.
FMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VS (100). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VS’s over the last 12 months.
FMZNF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as VS (96). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to VS’s over the last 12 months.
FMZNF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as VS (45). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to VS’s over the last 12 months.
VS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as FMZNF (100). This means that VS’s stock grew similarly to FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.
FMZNF | VS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago25% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago23% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago20% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago20% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FMZNF and OPRX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMZNF and OPRX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMZNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FMZNF | 100% | N/A | ||
OPRX - FMZNF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
NTWK - FMZNF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
VS - FMZNF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.17% | ||
IGGGF - FMZNF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GMGI - FMZNF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |