Ad is loading...
FN
Price
$226.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
81 days until earnings call
LFUS
Price
$237.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FN vs LFUS

Header iconFN vs LFUS Comparison
Open Charts FN vs LFUSBanner chart's image
Fabrinet
Price$226.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.17M
CapitalizationN/A
Littelfuse
Price$237.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$109.64K
CapitalizationN/A
FN vs LFUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FN vs. LFUS commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a Hold and LFUS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (FN: $226.30 vs. LFUS: $237.94)
Brand notoriety: FN and LFUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 179% vs. LFUS: 111%
Market capitalization -- FN: $8.21B vs. LFUS: $5.9B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $8.21B. LFUS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $5.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $88.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than LFUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFUS is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а -10.20% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

LFUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.72% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FN($8.21B) has a higher market cap than LFUS($5.9B). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than FN: LFUS (30.68) vs FN (26.78). FN YTD gains are higher at: 18.899 vs. LFUS (-10.380). LFUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. FN (372M). FN has less debt than LFUS: FN (4.85M) vs LFUS (930M). FN has higher revenues than LFUS: FN (3B) vs LFUS (2.2B).
FNLFUSFN / LFUS
Capitalization8.21B5.9B139%
EBITDA372M426M87%
Gain YTD18.899-10.380-182%
P/E Ratio26.7830.6887%
Revenue3B2.2B137%
Total Cash909MN/A-
Total Debt4.85M930M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs LFUS: Fundamental Ratings
FN
LFUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5864
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1059
SMR RATING
1..100
5077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (25) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (69) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (59) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (77) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (61) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLFUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMIN80.300.33
+0.41%
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
JAAA50.870.02
+0.04%
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
PWS30.90N/A
N/A
Pacer WealthShield ETF
XTEN45.69-0.09
-0.21%
BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten YrTrgDurUSTrsETF
SHOC45.53-0.16
-0.35%
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been loosely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
+0.05%
CTS - LFUS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
PLXS - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
APH - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
KN - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
OLED - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More