Advertisement
KN vs LFUS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Knowles Corporation (KN) vs. Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Knowles Corporation (KN) reported strong Q1 2026 results with revenue up 15.8% year-over-year to $153.1 million, beating estimates, driven by broad-based demand.
- Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) shares have shown robust momentum, gaining approximately 17% over the recent month amid positive market sentiment.
- Both companies operate in the electronic components sector, but KN focuses on audio and precision devices while LFUS specializes in circuit protection.
- KN stock trades around $30 with recent volatility, while LFUS hovers near $395, reflecting stronger price appreciation over the past year.
- Relative performance highlights LFUS's momentum edge, but KN demonstrates superior recent earnings growth.
Introduction
Knowles Corporation (KN) and Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) are key players in the electronic components industry, serving demanding markets like consumer electronics, automotive, and industrial applications. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business drivers, and relative positioning amid volatile sector trends. Traders seeking short-term momentum opportunities and investors focused on growth in precision devices and protection technologies will find value in understanding how these stocks stack up in the current environment. With both exhibiting distinct strengths, the analysis highlights trade-offs in valuation, sentiment, and catalysts for informed decision-making.
KN Overview and Recent Performance
Knowles Corporation (KN), a leader in micro-acoustic microphones, speakers, and high-performance capacitors, has benefited from steady demand in mobile consumer electronics and precision devices. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $30, showing resilience after touching 52-week highs near $32. Key influences include robust Q1 2026 results, with revenue of $153.1 million surpassing expectations by 3.9% and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.27 beating forecasts. Adjusted EBITDA rose to $35.3 million, reflecting operational efficiency amid broad-based growth. Sentiment has been buoyed by strategic pricing and demand recovery, though minor pullbacks occurred on cash flow concerns. Broader trends in audio solutions and medtech have supported positive positioning.
LFUS Overview and Recent Performance
Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS), an industrial technology firm specializing in circuit protection components like fuses and relays, operates across automotive, industrial, and electronics sectors. Recent weeks have seen strong stock momentum, with shares advancing around 17% in the past month to near $395, building on over 120% gains in the last year. This reflects positive reactions to strategic moves like an $800 million credit agreement and dividend adjustments, alongside solid Q4 sales growth earlier in the year. Despite some annual net margin pressures at -3%, market sentiment favors its exposure to resilient end-markets. Volatility persists, but upward trends dominate amid broader industrial recovery.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as swing trading dips in industrials (up to +33.7% annualized return, 62% win rate) or semiconductor-focused plays (exceeding +100% returns, 60-68% win rates)—tailored to current volatility in sectors like semis, aerospace, and gold miners. Stats highlight profit factors from 1.5 to 6.9, profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 21.5, and trade durations from hours to weeks. Selected for superior adaptation to market conditions, they offer real-time signals for copy trading. Explore these bots to align with prevailing trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Knowles (KN) and Littelfuse (LFUS) share electronic components exposure but diverge in focus: KN emphasizes audio/micro-acoustics with growth from consumer and medtech, while LFUS leads in protection devices for industrial and EV applications. Recent momentum favors LFUS with sharper price gains, contrasting KN’s earnings-driven stability. Risk factors include supply chain pressures for both, but LFUS faces valuation scrutiny post-rally versus KN’s cash flow watch. Sector tailwinds in semis benefit LFUS more, while sentiment tilts toward LFUS’s scale.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward Littelfuse (LFUS) due to its superior recent momentum, consistent outperformance in volatile markets, and stronger positioning in high-growth industrial segments. While KN shows promising earnings trends, LFUS exhibits greater trend consistency and catalyst potential in the near term, suggesting higher probability of continued relative strength.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KN is a StrongBuy and LFUS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LFUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.76% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
KN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+5.17% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| KN | LFUS | KN / LFUS | |
| Capitalization | 3.4B | 11.9B | 29% |
| EBITDA | 122M | 210M | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 85.628 | 87.397 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 56.03 | 62.35 | 90% |
| Revenue | 614M | 2.49B | 25% |
| Total Cash | 41M | 482M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 152M | 712M | 21% |
KN | LFUS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KN's Valuation (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (62) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that KN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
KN's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (37) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that KN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
KN's SMR Rating (80) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (92) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that KN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
KN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (37) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that KN’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KN (66) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KN’s over the last 12 months.
| KN | LFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
KN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KN has been closely correlated with LFUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KN jumps, then LFUS could also see price increases.
LFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | +1.98% | ||
| KN - LFUS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| BHE - LFUS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| PLXS - LFUS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| CTS - LFUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| TTMI - LFUS | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||