FNB
Price
$16.24
Change
-$0.17 (-1.04%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.83B
29 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$44.78
Change
-$0.42 (-0.93%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
57.74B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs TFC

Header iconFNB vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs TFCBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$16.24
Change-$0.17 (-1.04%)
Volume$9.49M
Capitalization5.83B
Truist Financial
Price$44.78
Change-$0.42 (-0.93%)
Volume$6.9M
Capitalization57.74B
FNB vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. TFC commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Buy and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $16.24 vs. TFC: $44.78)
Brand notoriety: FNB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 125% vs. TFC: 92%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $5.83B vs. TFC: $57.74B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.83B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.24% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($57.7B) has a higher market cap than FNB($5.83B). FNB (12.59) and TFC (12.14) have similar P/E ratio . FNB YTD gains are higher at: 12.550 vs. TFC (7.086). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. FNB (535M). FNB has less debt than TFC: FNB (3.71B) vs TFC (61.1B). TFC has higher revenues than FNB: TFC (20B) vs FNB (1.64B).
FNBTFCFNB / TFC
Capitalization5.83B57.7B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.5507.086177%
P/E Ratio12.5912.14104%
Revenue1.64B20B8%
Total Cash535M5.16B10%
Total Debt3.71B61.1B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2568
SMR RATING
1..100
114
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4529
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (73) in the null industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (68) in the null industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FNB (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FNB (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (46) in the null industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCQ8.730.09
+1.04%
Pimco California Municipal Income Fund
ERY21.220.16
+0.76%
Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X ETF
LMBS49.970.06
+0.11%
First Trust Low Duration Oppos ETF
LIAE173.15N/A
N/A
LifeX 2050 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
PSCH40.39-0.37
-0.91%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF