Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs PFGCX
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs PFGCX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
PIMCO Long-Term US Government C
Price$13.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.19M
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. PFGCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and PFGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. PFGCX (740M). FNBGX pays higher dividends than PFGCX: FNBGX (3.81) vs PFGCX (2.47). FNBGX was incepted earlier than PFGCX: FNBGX (8 years) vs PFGCX (29 years). PFGCX (2.96) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). PFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFGCX: FNBGX (0) vs PFGCX (1000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.10 vs. PFGCX (-4.48). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -39.68 vs. PFGCX (-53.85).
| FNBGX | PFGCX | FNBGX / PFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.96 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.96 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.040 | -0.041 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 740M | 662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 2.47 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.10 | -4.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.70 | -15.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.68 | -53.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -61.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement