Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs PFGCX
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs PFGCX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.48
Change+$0.10 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.02B
PIMCO Long-Term US Government C
Price$14.10
Change+$0.19 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.44M
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. PFGCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and PFGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 5.02B vs. PFGCX (792M). FNBGX pays higher dividends than PFGCX: FNBGX (3.88) vs PFGCX (2.62). FNBGX was incepted earlier than PFGCX: FNBGX (8 years) vs PFGCX (29 years). PFGCX (4.75) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). PFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFGCX: FNBGX (0) vs PFGCX (1000). PFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.94 vs. FNBGX (-5.23). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -35.57 vs. PFGCX (-50.59).
| FNBGX | PFGCX | FNBGX / PFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 4.75 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 4.75 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.966 | 4.987 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 792M | 633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 2.62 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.23 | -4.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.83 | -5.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.57 | -50.59 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -60.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement