Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs PFGCX
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs PFGCX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.56
Change+$0.13 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.02B
PIMCO Long-Term US Government C
Price$14.36
Change+$0.19 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets789.07M
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. PFGCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and PFGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 5.02B vs. PFGCX (789M). FNBGX pays higher dividends than PFGCX: FNBGX (3.79) vs PFGCX (2.61). FNBGX was incepted earlier than PFGCX: FNBGX (8 years) vs PFGCX (29 years). PFGCX (4.75) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). PFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFGCX: FNBGX (0) vs PFGCX (1000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. PFGCX (-0.00). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -33.79 vs. PFGCX (-49.30).
| FNBGX | PFGCX | FNBGX / PFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 4.75 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 4.75 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.857 | 5.729 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 789M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 2.61 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -0.00 | -13,345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.61 | 1.95 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.79 | -49.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -61.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement