Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs PFGCX
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs PFGCX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
PIMCO Long-Term US Government C
Price$13.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets757.98M
FNBGX vs PFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. PFGCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and PFGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. PFGCX (758M). FNBGX pays higher dividends than PFGCX: FNBGX (3.87) vs PFGCX (2.47). FNBGX was incepted earlier than PFGCX: FNBGX (8 years) vs PFGCX (28 years). PFGCX (2.96) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). PFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFGCX: FNBGX (0) vs PFGCX (1000). FNBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.45 vs. PFGCX (-0.90). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -37.73 vs. PFGCX (-52.47).
| FNBGX | PFGCX | FNBGX / PFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.96 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.96 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.153 | 2.017 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 758M | 630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 2.47 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | -0.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.17 | -10.79 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.73 | -52.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -61.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement