Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs PRULX
FNBGX vs PRULX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs PRULX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.01
Change-$0.12 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
T. Rowe Price US Trs LongTerm Idx
Price$6.96
Change-$0.09 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
FNBGX vs PRULX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. PRULX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and PRULX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. PRULX (4.44B). PRULX (3.98) and FNBGX (3.87) have matching dividends . FNBGX was incepted earlier than PRULX: FNBGX (8 years) vs PRULX (36 years). PRULX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). PRULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRULX: FNBGX (0) vs PRULX (2500). PRULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.98 vs. FNBGX (-3.12). FNBGX return over 5 years is better than : -35.80 vs. PRULX (-44.96).
| FNBGX | PRULX | FNBGX / PRULX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.29 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.173 | 0.918 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 4.44B | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 3.98 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.12 | -1.98 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.92 | -14.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.80 | -44.96 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -27.12 | - |