FNBT
Price
$40.60
Change
+$0.50 (+1.25%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
498.65M
WTBFB
Price
$317.00
Change
-$0.73 (-0.23%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
800.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNBT vs WTBFB

Header iconFNBT vs WTBFB Comparison
Open Charts FNBT vs WTBFBBanner chart's image
FineMark Holdings
Price$40.60
Change+$0.50 (+1.25%)
Volume$26.07K
Capitalization498.65M
W.T.B. Financial
Price$317.00
Change-$0.73 (-0.23%)
Volume$115
Capitalization800.18M
FNBT vs WTBFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNBT vs. WTBFB commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBT is a Hold and WTBFB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FNBT: $40.10 vs. WTBFB: $317.73)
Brand notoriety: FNBT and WTBFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNBT: 25% vs. WTBFB: 2%
Market capitalization -- FNBT: $498.65M vs. WTBFB: $800.18M
FNBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $498.65M. WTBFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $800.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTBFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNBT is a better buy in the long-term than WTBFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBFB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WTBFB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTBFB is a better buy in the short-term than FNBT.

Price Growth

FNBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while WTBFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBFB($800M) has a higher market cap than FNBT($499M). FNBT has higher P/E ratio than WTBFB: FNBT (169.17) vs WTBFB (11.37). FNBT YTD gains are higher at: 51.036 vs. WTBFB (4.398). FNBT has less debt than WTBFB: FNBT (392M) vs WTBFB (500M). WTBFB has higher revenues than FNBT: WTBFB (380M) vs FNBT (85.3M).
FNBTWTBFBFNBT / WTBFB
Capitalization499M800M62%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.0364.3981,160%
P/E Ratio169.1711.371,487%
Revenue85.3M380M22%
Total CashN/A165M-
Total Debt392M500M78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNBT vs WTBFB: Fundamental Ratings
FNBT
WTBFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3761
SMR RATING
1..100
8122
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WTBFB's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FNBT (100). This means that WTBFB’s stock grew similarly to FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (61). This means that FNBT’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

WTBFB's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNBT (81). This means that WTBFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (51). This means that FNBT’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBFB (84). This means that FNBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBTWTBFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
25%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNBSX10.37N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Income Builder I
AXVIX19.13N/A
N/A
Acclivity Small Cap Value I
PMCKX25.25N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value R6
SIMYX13.18N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol Y (SIMT)
TRZNX20.23N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z

FNBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNBT and RF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNBT and RF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNBT
1D Price
Change %
FNBT100%
-0.89%
RF - FNBT
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
VBNK - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
MCHT - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
CFR - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More

WTBFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBFB has been loosely correlated with BANF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBFB jumps, then BANF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBFB
1D Price
Change %
WTBFB100%
-0.08%
BANF - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
STBA - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
TCBK - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
EFSC - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
ASB - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More