FNCJF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.72M
FOSYF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.03 (-7.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCJF vs FOSYF

Header iconFNCJF vs FOSYF Comparison
Open Charts FNCJF vs FOSYFBanner chart's image
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$50.2K
Capitalization15.72M
Forsys Metals
Price$0.39
Change-$0.03 (-7.14%)
Volume$8.42K
Capitalization84M
FNCJF vs FOSYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCJF vs. FOSYF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCJF is a Hold and FOSYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCJF: $0.06 vs. FOSYF: $0.39)
Brand notoriety: FNCJF and FOSYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCJF: 55% vs. FOSYF: 33%
Market capitalization -- FNCJF: $15.72M vs. FOSYF: $84M
FNCJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.72M. FOSYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOSYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOSYF is a better buy in the long-term than FNCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOSYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FOSYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FNCJF and FOSYF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while FOSYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOSYF($84M) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.7M). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 29.717 vs. FOSYF (-9.931). FNCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.75M vs. FOSYF (-2.46M). FNCJF has more cash in the bank: 24.1M vs. FOSYF (4.48M). FNCJF (0) and FOSYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FNCJFFOSYFFNCJF / FOSYF
Capitalization15.7M84M19%
EBITDA1.75M-2.46M-71%
Gain YTD29.717-9.931-299%
P/E Ratio2.95N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash24.1M4.48M538%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCJF vs FOSYF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCJF
FOSYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
7194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9586
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4830

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOSYF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (74). This means that FOSYF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FOSYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (100). This means that FOSYF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSYF (94). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

FOSYF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (55). This means that FOSYF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FOSYF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (95). This means that FOSYF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCJFFOSYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAB117.801.38
+1.19%
ESAB Corp
ANDE41.40-0.09
-0.22%
Andersons
REFR1.29-0.01
-0.77%
Research Frontiers
WEYS30.87-0.59
-1.88%
Weyco Group
MA584.22-11.42
-1.92%
Mastercard

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-4.22%
OMHLF - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPOCF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FPRGF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOSYF - FNCJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
More

FOSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSYF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSYF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOSYF
1D Price
Change %
FOSYF100%
-7.58%
TECK - FOSYF
33%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
IVPAF - FOSYF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
VALE - FOSYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
MP - FOSYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
LTSRF - FOSYF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More